- #How did bradley manning threaten the state’s monopoly over the use of force code#
- #How did bradley manning threaten the state’s monopoly over the use of force free#
Shooting wounded victims was like “a child torturing ants with a magnifying glass,” he said. They murdered anyone trying to help them. US helicopter pilots gunned down innocent civilians. America’s “obsessed with capturing and killing people,” he said. He called war logs given WikiLeaks “some of the most important documents of our time.” He chose ones he believed “wouldn’t cause harm to the United States.” He hoped a national debate would follow his revelations. Justice demands no less. Manning faces 22 charges. Top culpable civilian and military officials should be held fully accountable. America should be on trial, not Manning! He revealed war crimes too egregious to be kept secret. It prohibits pre-trial confinement conditions “any more rigorous” than what’s minimally needed to ensure the accused appears for court hearings. Doing so violates Eight Amendment protection against “cruel and unusual punishments.” US statute laws were violated. He’s been isolated throughout much of it. Manning’s been held over three years without trial.
#How did bradley manning threaten the state’s monopoly over the use of force code#
The Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) calls for trial within 120 days of restraint and arraignment. The Rule for Court Martial (RCM) 707 mandates the same thing. Doing so violates constitutional law. It mandates the right to a speedy trial by an impartial jury. At issue is convicting him for doing the right thing. Manning’s trial proceedings will be secret, not public. If convicted, he faces possible life in prison. Especially high-profile cases like Manning. The Sixth Amendment states: “In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation to be confronted with the witnesses against him to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defence.” The Constitution mandates ALL criminal prosecutions. Doing so publicly leaves no doubt. So do secret trial proceedings. Pronouncing guilt by accusation assures his conviction.
#How did bradley manning threaten the state’s monopoly over the use of force free#
He does so at home and abroad. With a stroke of his pen he could free Manning. Obama reflects the worst of US governance. (Manning) broke the law.” No nation spurns inviolable laws more egregiously than America. “We don’t let individuals make decisions about how the law operates. His word is final. “We are a nation of laws,” he claimed. Doing so denies any possibility of judicial fairness. Pre-trial, Obama pronounced him guilty by accusation. Bradley Manning court-martial proceedings began. Excluding it reflects police state justice. On June 3, United States v. Information refuting charges of “aiding the enemy” is barred from trial proceedings. Claiming it’s not relevant or harmful to national security doesn’t wash.
Evidence vital to Manning’s defense is prohibited. Washington has no right to conceal them. Secrecy, lawlessness, and contempt for humanity define US policy. By Stephen Lendman – Posted on 04 June 2013īradley Manning Court-Martial: Secrecy and Injustice on Trial by Stephen Lendman America honors its worst.